The Question.

Over the last several days, I have been thinking about the four topics I discussed in my previous post:

  • Ruin Regeneration / Historic Preservation
  • Biophilia in Hospitality
  • Integration of Health and Wellness in the Urban Landscape
  • Importance of Empathic Design

I have listed possible topics and angles for each one. While that task has resulted in solid leads, one has come to mind that I am not only interested in, but I am very excited to research. It beats out the other topics by a long shot.  

New topic: the conventional shopping experience. Who doesn't want to talk about shopping! When I lived in Dallas (2004-2012) and found myself in my apartment bored, I would go to Northpark Mall, a high-end indoor shopping center. And I mean HIGH END. They have Tiffanys, Carolina Herrera, and Oscar De La Renta storefronts. It was my usual weekend hangout as a place to stroll about the mall's central circulation with my Sonic drink in hand, doing a lot of window shopping. I was fascinated, never brave enough to step into Roberto Cavalli, but instead could be found in Anthropologie or Forever21. Much more my price range. The mall had various end-users, shops and restaurants, a movie theatre, and outdoor spaces.  The mall has direct access to Interstate 75, the main drag, running north and south through Dallas. They have a bus stop on-site and is a short walk from the above-ground tram, known as the DART.

 


     

Fast forward to 2014; we move to Northwest Arkansas, where the only indoor mall is a 40-minute drive from where I live in Fayetteville, home of the University of Arkansas. I was aghast to find the mall nearly abandoned by retailers and visitors. Of course, the exception is when Bath and Body Works has their semi-annual sale or Dillards non-publicized, end of the year sale. Let's face it. No one can resist those. But still, this mall, like many others across the country, is failing to bring in new end-users and struggling to keep their current ones. I want to explore why this is happening and what solution can remedy and reinvent?

 


Possible questions within this broad topic could be the following:

 Question 1:  The rise and fall of indoor shopping centers. How can the architecture and design field reinvent the in-person hospitality/retail experience as it battles online shopping convenience?  

Exploration:  Look at the master plan of the real estate development and identify key point indicators, otherwise known as KPIs, to determine improvement opportunities. I will also explore the interior design qualities such as layout, access, and lighting to identify additional user-centric opportunities.


Question 2:  How can the conventional shopping center reinvent its business model to attract cross-generations and various end-users' interests? What are other in-person shopping prototypes doing that are successful?

Exploration:  Investigate the tenant demographics, compare retail and hospitality offerings, and active vs. rest destinations within the footprint. Additionally, how will owners accommodate in-person and online retailers within the real estate footprint? Is there a compromise when looking at the return on investment and cost per square footage?


Question 3:   What influence does the site selection have on its future success? What KPIs are the key to ensuring a profitable and sustainable destination for current and future generations?

Exploration:  Explore local demographics, purchasing trends, and other shopping prototypes to determine how the site selection plays a role in the success of the business model.

Stay tuned for next week's post "The Question: Part Two - The Power of RE: re-imagine, re-purpose, re-brand."

Comments

  1. The future of retail and the conventional shopping experience is a fascinating topic! I've always enjoyed the physical experience of shopping in a store- the sensory experiences are half the reason I would ever go shopping. The various atmospheres, aroma, fabrics, music, all the things. I can't help but wonder about online shopping's role in the decline of shopping malls across the nation. No doubt it's a main contributor, but why are people willing to give up the activity of shopping for clicking on a screen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks a great question Hannah. Why ARE people willing to give up the activity of in person shopping for the online option. Is it the wider variety on one screen as opposed to multi-locations? I'm looking into the term "convenience" with respect to time, money, space, travel, and service to see how at least one of these plays a distinct part in the fall of the shopping center, or how they benefit mixed-use developments.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Working List: Literature Reviews - Citations & Resources "Convenience"